OT: Wanted: Android App Developer $??? Reward

Tue Aug 5 12:12:34 MST 2014

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: techlists at phpcoderusa.com
To: Main PLUG discussion list <plug-discuss at lists.phxlinux.org>
Cc:
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 17:16:26 -0700
Subject: Re: OT: Wanted: Android App Developer $??? Reward ...

Your CIO example was not lost on me.  I get it.  I'm focusing on the market
and how it effects my ability to make a living as a freelance developer.
 For me it is about demand/compensation, is the projected life cycle long
enough to make it worth while making the necessary investment of time to
become competent, and is it something I really would like to do.

It is kind of like a personal hedgehog -

1) what are you passionate about?
2) what can you be the best at?
3) does it drive your economic engine?

I would add two more
4) is the projected life cycle long enough to reasonably recoup one's
investment to become competent?
5) is the barrier to entry low enough to make the transition worth while?

I'm sure you can add a couple more.

On 2014-08-04 16:59, David Schwartz wrote:

> Back in the 80’s, M$ was just another compiler vendor, one of several.
> And they weren’t even considered the best.
>
> It has been estimated that their software development tools division
> alone would rank as a Fortune 100 business entity. But they actually
> receive very little direct revenues because they get subsidized by
> other divisions. Today they exist mainly because they drove everybody
> else out of business. It’s hard to compete as a compiler vendor when
> M$ gives a company free dev tools if their CIO agrees to buy a huge
> bundle of database and OS technology.
>
> The fact that Delphi still exists is amazing in its own right. And it
> will be around for quite a while because the Veterans Administration
> has one of the largest installed bases of Delphi software in America,
> if not in the world, that’s still under active development — and it
> would be horribly expensive to replace with M$ technology (although
> some does exist).
>
> If the VA ever releases any mobile apps, there’s a very good chance
> they’ll be built with Delphi.
>
> Because of this relationship with the VA, Delphi has a rather unusual
> affinity with medical software developers.
>
> My earlier point seems to have been missed … if you’re a CIO on a
> tight budget and you REALLY want to SAVE MONEY, then it simply makes
> no sense to ignore AppMethod or RAD Studio today.
>
> You cannot talk about either Android or iOS development assuming
> there’s only one option any more. Android is _mainly_ Java, while iOS
> is _mainly_ Objective-C. But AppMethod/RAD Studio supports both, and
> now Swift supports iOS.
>
> Also don’t ignore the fact that we’re starting to see Android running
> on Intel architectures now, which is going to open them up to non-Java
> tool stacks as well. (Some of the latest low-end Acer tablets run
> KitKat on Intel CPUs.)
>
> Personally, I see the potential for much more heterogeneity in terms
> of development tools for both Android and iOS going forward than we’ve
> seen in Windows, if for no other reason than one company does NOT
> control both of them. M$ couldn’t persuade any major phone companies
> to use their OS, so they simply bought what was for a long time the
> market leader. I have no idea what they plan to do with Nokia, but M$
> currently has less than 5% of the mobile platform market; perhaps
> Nokia can get them to 10%.
>
> Getting back to that CIO again, now he’s going to be faced hiring yet
> ANOTHER developer to work with ANOTHER dev stack for Nokia’s hardware.
>
> That’s now $300k for 3 people using “free” tools vs. $100k and a
> single $5k tool.
>
> Something’s gotta give. Free tools are simply NOT an economical model
> for companies that MUST have a presence on ALL MOBILE PLATFORMS!
>
> -David
>
>
>
> On Aug 4, 2014, at 3:58 PM, techlists at phpcoderusa.com wrote:
>
>
>> It all makes sense to me.  As for the individual, I still wonder what the
>> Android market will look like 10 years from now.  Since it is Google's baby
>> I think Android has 30 years in it.  Look at M$.  It has taken them 30+
>> years to become less relevant.  Maybe the cycle is speeding up.... maybe it
>> is now 15 years.  15 years is good enough for me. The other side is
>> enjoyment.  I cannot see myself working on something I do not like......
>> Maybe Android development might not be fulfilling.... I won't know until I
>> get a chance to swim in it, and that might be after the new year.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2014-08-04 15:41, David Schwartz wrote:
>>
>>> I understand your point, Keith, but even though Android uses Java, and
>>> Java IS considered “mainstream”, that does not seem to be translating
>>> into making it easy(er) to find Android mobile developers, is it?
>>> The ones out there ARE getting top-dollar, as well as iOS developers.
>>> C++ is also a mainstream language, and if you get RAD Studio, you get
>>> C++, Pascal (Delphi) and php/HTML5 in the same box, at least two of
>>> which ARE “mainstream”.
>>> There’s also their newest offering, AppMethod, which has a pricing
>>> structure more similar to other RAD Mobile development tools.  It’s
>>> basically RAD Studio without the Windows-specific stuff (ie., it’s
>>> mobile-centric rather than Windows-centric).
>>> Honestly, Embarcadero is taking a big gamble by investing in their
>>> cross-platform strategy the way they are. Any company seriously
>>> looking at developing the same app for both iOS and Android is stuck
>>> hiring two development teams with two different development tacks and
>>> two different sets of skill sets.
>>> Using RAD Studio or AppMethod, this can be narrowed down to one, eg.,
>>> Delphi/Pascal or C++, for both platforms.
>>> At some point, a not-too-dense CIO is going to ask, “Why do we need
>>> two sets of developers at $100k PER PLATFORM that uses FREE tools when
>>> we can spend $5k and only have to pay $100k for ONE developer?”
>>> It would seem that “free tools” are costing an extra $95k to reach
>>> both platforms.
>>> Don’t you think $5k is a lot more affordable than $95k?
>>> (Ok, so if you’re REALLY CHEAP, it’s $50k rather than $100k, but …
>>> that’s STILL at least 10x the cost of a dual-platform development tool
>>> that ONE person can use!)
>>> -David
>>> On Aug 4, 2014, at 1:56 PM, techlists at phpcoderusa.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> In the 80's I began to develop using dBaseII, then dBaseIII...
>>>> dBaseIII+, foxBase+, Clipper 87, Visual FoxPro..... It was a great file
>>>> server database system that was probably the best tool on the market for
>>>> developing small company database applications.
>>>> The problem is it was a niche skill set.  dBase jobs were few and far
>>>> between.  I would still be working with FoxPro if M$ had not bought it and
>>>> everyone bailed.  FoxPro is now dead thanks to M$.  That was the tool of
>>>> choice for me and I would still be developing with it if it was up to me.
>>>> Having had that experience I am leery of tying my wagon to something
>>>> like Delphi. I really enjoyed Turbo Pascal in the early to mid 80's. I'm
>>>> sure I would enjoy object oriented Turbo Pascal ie Delphi. I've heard tons
>>>> of good things about Dephi going back maybe 10 or 12 years, maybe longer.
>>>> Unfortunately Delphi is not main stream enough for me. I do not want to
>>>> tie my wagon to another FoxPro.
>>>> On 2014-08-04 13:35, David Schwartz wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Delphi is just as easy to use as VB, if not easier.
>>>>> Have you looked at it lately?
>>>>> It’s just not considered “mainstream” any longer.
>>>>> People say, “Oh, is THAT still around?”
>>>>> Yup. Check it out.
>>>>> http://embarcadero.com
>>>>> They also have a tool they now call HTML5Builder or something along
>>>>> that line, which is an allusion to their C++ Builder app — a C++
>>>>> version of Delphi.  HTML5Builder is a PHP/HTML5 version.
>>>>> -David "The Tool Wiz" Schwartz
>>>>> On Aug 4, 2014, at 11:40 AM, techlists at phpcoderusa.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2014-08-04 10:57, David Schwartz wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now we’ve got a new language: Apple introduced Swift and is making it
>>>>>>> available for free, like their other tools. This is going to
>>>>>>> stimulate
>>>>>>> a whole new generation of devleopers to jump into the fray and start
>>>>>>> building apps for iOS — apps that are going to be hard to “port” over
>>>>>>> to Android platforms, or even web platforms.
>>>>>>> I’ve talked with Joe about his app. To his credit, he’s focused
>>>>>>> mainly
>>>>>>> on the app. But what he’s missed is the fact that, IMHO, he’s
>>>>>>> over-spec’ed it to the point where you'd need so much custom code to
>>>>>>> impement what appears to be a simple tool that he’ll never be happy
>>>>>>> with the end result. His UI design makes assumptions based on HIS
>>>>>>> experience with *nix shell scripting, and he clearly explains this in
>>>>>>> the spec. There are no native widgets that work like “grep” in the
>>>>>>> Android world!  So he’ll be extremely hard-pressed to find anybody
>>>>>>> who’ll build it for him within the budget he’s demanding.
>>>>>>> I’ve worked with something called Delphi since Borland introduced it
>>>>>>> in 1995. Starting with the XE2 release a few years back, they’ve been
>>>>>>> embracing a multi-platform targeting strategy where you can develop
>>>>>>> apps in one language that will run on any of the popular platforms:
>>>>>>> Windows, OS X, iOS, and Android. And it actually WORKS!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is what we need - build once run everywhere.  I personally think
>>>>>> web development is way behind in they types of tools we have.  I often
>>>>>> wonder why we do not have something like VB that is drag and drop.  Instead
>>>>>> we build everything every time.  The web dev model is very expensive.
>>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------
>>>>> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss at lists.phxlinux.org
>>>>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
>>>>> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------
>>>> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss at lists.phxlinux.org
>>>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
>>>> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------
>>> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss at lists.phxlinux.org
>>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
>>> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------
>> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss at lists.phxlinux.org
>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
>> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss at lists.phxlinux.org
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>

...

[Message clipped]  View entire message
<https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=4622540777&view=om&th=147a78ae736b2ef4>

The index at the top of the digest indicated that there was a second thread
started in this digest, but as you can see above, the digest was clipped
before ever getting to the second subject, so I can only guess at what the
contents might have been.

Mike

-- 
"Creativity is intelligence having fun." — Albert Einstein
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.phxlinux.org/pipermail/plug-discuss/attachments/20140805/bd8fa1b6/attachment.html>