OT: ICANN and NRO

[Chris Gehlker]

On Jun 24, 2009, at 10:25 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:

> I did. The fact that the site is sponsored by Conoco-Phillips would
> indicate that it deserves extra scrutiny, to be sure. So be sure to  
> give
> the content extra scrutiny. I think it'd be foolish though to  
> disregard
> it entirely because of the source or affiliation.

It's a tough issue. I certainly agree that the facts are more  
important than the sponsorship. If the authors of the site had been up  
front about who they were representing, I wouldn't have bothered to  
comment. But my own take is that there are enough sites out there  
which are up front about their sponsorship that I don't have time for  
those that aren't. If a site obscures it's affiliation I think it is   
reasonable to assume that it is deliberately misleading about other  
things.
--
Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!