OT: [sorta]: from wired.com : Why Isn't Wireless [IP] Everywhere?

[Mike Schwartz]

TYPO in URL:  (I think)the first link in the quote below, was taken straight
from
one of the reader comments at the first URL given below;
but I think it may be wrong;
try this instead: just
<http://www.wirevolution.com/2007/09/07/how-does-80211n-get-to-600mbps/>
http://www.wirevolution.com/2007/09/07/how-does-80211n-get-to-600mbps/
thank you...
-- 
Mike Schwartz
Glendale  AZ
schwartz at acm.org

On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Mike Schwartz <schwartz at acm.org> wrote:

> Quote from one of the reader comments at
> http://www.wired.com/gadgets/miscellaneous/magazine/17-06/ts_burningquestion <http://www.wired.com/gadgets/miscellaneous/magazine/17-06/ts_burningquestion>
> ("Burning Question: Why Isn't Wireless Net Access Available Everywhere?")
> :
>
> <<
>
>       WiFi is now much faster than WiMAX (600 Mbps)
> http://www.wirevolution.com/2007/09/07/how-does-80211n-get-to-600mbps/get to
> 600Mbps? and has had proven long distance capability for over 10 years, up
> to 50 miles. EtherLinx could have covered the entire U.S. and half the World
> by now with Long Range and Local WiFi solutions at a fraction of the money
> already sunk in WiMAX.[...]  >>
>
>
> submitted to PLUG-Discuss by:
> --
> Mike Schwartz
> Glendale  AZ
> schwartz at acm.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/pipermail/plug-discuss/attachments/20090609/b3360e89/attachment.htm