Why not Grub as master boot loader WAS GAG boot loader needs improvement IMHO

JT Moree moreejt at pcxperience.com
Sun Nov 26 07:59:50 MST 2006


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

>> which /boot do I use? 
> 
> I don't understand why you have to ask this question. Do you have separate
> boot partitionS, or a single *shared* boot partition? If it's shared there's
> only one, so what's the point of this question?
There are no boot partitions.  To minimize partition proliferation I
include /boot in each partition with it's distro.  The one fake /boot
that holds grub does just that.  holds grub.  No kernels.

> The only problem I ran into with this setup was Ubuntu seeing the CentOS
> kernels and thinking that they were Ubuntu and adding them to menu.lst when
> they were already there (outside of the magic portion). No big deal removing
> them from the menu.lst though.

No big deal to you but that's a lot of work.  Every time a distro
updates a kernel it grabs all the other kernels and then you have to
clean out grub.  I personally would NOT share the boot partition for
this reason.  I have 5 distros installed and a lot of kernels.  YMMV

> The single *shared* /boot handles this nicely.

Humbly, I disagree.  The whole point of using GAG is to MINIMIZE the
amount of work I have to do to maintain or fix the system.  Again, the
reason I switched from grub.

- --
JT Morée
PC Xperience, Inc.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFaavm1JwGi/ukQqERAu06AJ0VXDfK2HpotcD9wGr9/rh4S75GmgCg32Zj
kx15S6I/vD/MZklz/amE+cg=
=8XV+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.



More information about the PLUG-discuss mailing list