memory

[Edward Norton]

On 12/26/06, Michael Havens <bmike101 at cox.net> wrote:
>
> Tuesday 26 December 2006 9:11 pm, saw the creation of:
> > From what you said earlier, it didn't sound like more main (on-board)
> > memory would speed things up.  I don't want you to waste money
> > solving the wrong problem.
> >
> > Dale Farnsworth
>
> I have a question. It seems that everything slowed after I started running
> the
> 2.6 kernel Could that be the problem?
> I wouldn't think so but as I've said before..... what does that mean?
> ---------------------------------------------------


2.6 isn't really meant for older hardware, that's more 2.4
's job. If you're on older hardware,
you're not going to want a bloated experimental kernel like 2.6. Stick with
2.4.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/pipermail/plug-discuss/attachments/20061227/694e4705/attachment.htm