too many choices (distros)

Siri Amrit Kaur tigerflag at tigerflag.com
Thu Oct 6 11:15:21 MST 2005


On Wednesday 05 October 2005 03:39 pm Micah DesJardins kindly wrote:
> As much as we keep talking about the differences, the reality is
> (for me at least) that there really aren't that many big
> differences:
>
> Basically you're looking at .deb distros, .rpm distros, or source
> distros. Beyond that it's all about the distro philosophy, the
> relative "speed" of the project's distribution cycle,
> community/third party support and what it is you're looking for in
> a distribution.
>
> Anybody else feel the same? (or differently?)
>
> Micah

There's also a difference in init systems- how the system launches 
it's applications and services. Slackware and it's derivatives use 
the BSD-style init system. Most other Linuxes use the SysV-init. 

I started with Mandrake 8.0. Tried a lot of different distros because 
I wanted to learn. It wasn't until my second try of Slackware that I 
really started learning much. Slack uses the BSD-style init system. I 
find it much simpler to understand than SysV. I've tried and tried to 
understand how to turn something on or off in a SysV system, and 
people in this list have tried to help me, but I just don't get it. I 
don't know if I like Slack's setup because it was the first one I 
learned, or I learned it because it's just simpler than SysV. Being 
able to understand and tweak the init system can be an important 
thing to consider.

Siri Amrit


More information about the PLUG-discuss mailing list