dumb GIMP question

[Ted Gould]

--=-x4JJNR7sETmg6Jl8Zrn9
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


> As much as I like gimp and use it daily.  Could it possibly be because
> gimp has a HORRID interface?  i.e. don't blame yourself for missing
> functionality in gimp, the interface sucks.

You really think so?  I really like it.  What would you change?  Keep in
mind that you need to be able to work on multiple images...  I've seen
posts saying this in various places, but I've never seen anyone say why
they believe this.  Most people I've talked to say that it is an
interface with a learning curve, but not a bad one.

		--Ted

--=-x4JJNR7sETmg6Jl8Zrn9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEABECAAYFAj4XnYkACgkQLE335pRPGp1uZACgvDxGzTJNKjynZdeX/m9ZEs0s
lzEAnjPbnyWqDve7RjOLUoyoDKSMcWj7
=g+Zb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-x4JJNR7sETmg6Jl8Zrn9--