Qwest/Actiontec/Cisco/Server issues

Darrell Shandrow plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
Thu, 2 Jan 2003 15:59:35 -0700


Hi Eric,

Though I set up several Actiontecs so far, I have been fortunate that the
needs have been very basic: a single dynamic or static IP address on the ISP
end and basic needs on the LAN, using DHCP to assign 192.168.0.0/24 IP
addresses and NAT for Internet access...  The additional discussion has been
enlightening for me.

Thanks.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Lee Green" <eric@badtux.org>
To: <plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us>
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 3:55 PM
Subject: Re: Qwest/Actiontec/Cisco/Server issues


> On Thursday 02 January 2003 12:39 pm, Darrell Shandrow wrote:
> > Hi Eric,
> >
> > So, you're setting up static routes to get around the fact that it is
> > impossible to specify subnet masks for the IP addresses when configuring
> > the Actiontec?
>
> I suppose. It was the only way I could get it to work. You can specify a
> subnet mask for a static route, whereas the PPPoA would not let me specify
a
> subnet mask for the static IP address. This is with Qworst talking to
FastQ
> as my ISP. It's a single static route, BTW. I'm not at home where the
> Actiontec lives (and of course turned off the remote management as soon as
> the ISP was finished with it!), so I can't give you more details, I do
> remember it was a royal PITA and neither Qworst nor FastQ had the foggiest
> idea how to deliver my subnet with the ActionTec (in fairness, I was the
> first customer with an ActionTec that FastQ had ever encountered).
>
> --
> Eric Lee Green          GnuPG public key at
http://badtux.org/eric/eric.gpg
>           mailto:eric@badtux.org  Web: http://www.badtux.org
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change  you mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss