Netstumbling and US Law

[George Toft]

Bill Nash wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Tony Wasson wrote:
> 
> > I have heard Netstumbling defended as 'mapping local frequencies in use'. If
> > you are deploying your own wireless network, you'd want to make sure you do
> > not interfere with existing networks.
> >
> 
>         That's a clever way of doing it. What happens when they ask why I
> was mapping frequencies on the other side of town? =)
> 
> - billn
> 
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change  you mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


It's to make sure that it doesn't interfere with that tin can
directional antenna you set up:
http://www.oreillynet.com/lpt/wlg/448

or the satellite dish:
http://www.wwc.edu/~frohro/Airport/Primestar/Primestar.html

Yeah, that's the ticket!

George
-- 
              Irrefutable fact about projects: You can have 
                it Quick, Cheap, or Right - pick any two.
What does that tell you if your project is ahead of schedule and under
budget?