Uptime Baby!

[Digital Wokan]

While older kernels may have certain vulnerabilities, it may be that the
system concerned isn't exposed to other situations where those exploits
become executable.  Exploits requiring physical access to the system are
solved with a lock on the server room door.  Exploits that are done over
a network are not an issue for standalone systems and are mitigated on
systems adequately protected from outside assault (though more layers of
protection would be smarter in my book, sometimes a system doesn't have
the opportunity to be brought down.

George Toft wrote:
> 
> "J.L.Francois" wrote:
> >
> > The next time someone says Linux can't hang show them this.
> > This is a SparcClassic with  32MB RAM serving WWW pages
> > and my Sparc test platform.
> > Obsolete hardware to everyone but me.
> >
> > I wanted to get this out before I have to start turning equipment
> > off to mount in imy refrigerator converted to server cabinet.
> >
> > Woops, gotta go and reboot my wifes Win98 desktop, again.
> >
> > ==============================================
> > Linux heirophant 2.0.35 #1 Wed Feb 17 20:37:03 CET 1999 sparc unknown
> >   5:55pm  up 406 days,  6:57,  1 user,  load average: 0.04, 0.01, 0.00
> 
> Uptime is nice, but I hate to see uptime over 150 days - it shows that
> the kernel has not been updated against various exploits.  The 2.0.35
> kernel is about three years old, and I'm pretty sure there are some remote
> compromises up to the 2.2.13 kernel.  Maybe the sparc kernel is different?
> 
> Feel free to correct me if I am wrong.
> 
> George
> ---
> Compared to Linux, working with the Windows desktop is like performing
> gymnastics in a strait jacket.
> 
> ________________________________________________
> See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
> 
> Plug-discuss mailing list  -  Plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss