TrueNAS vs Samba

Scott L. plug at sl.neteng.cc
Mon Jan 13 20:33:47 MST 2025


I'm more of a day-to-day Windows user, but I maintain two Ubuntu servers 
(my Raspi and a VPS). From my experience, Samba can be rather difficult 
to set up. In fact, I wasn't able to get it working between my Pi and 
Win10 desktop.

The problem is there are many different versions of SMB/CIFS. I think I 
may have disabled one of the services needed as well. Samba is supposed 
to be simple. In fact, it's capable of hosting an Active Directory domain 
if I'm not mistaken.

You may want to look into something more use case specific, such as 
Syncthing. You can find more at the following links. It's a FOSS project.

- https://syncthing.net/
- https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing

---
Scott Lopez
Email: plug at sl.neteng.cc
Web: https://bio.neteng.pro

Jan 13, 2025 9:46:01 AM techlists at phpcoderusa.com:

> Hi,
>
> Lets say I have a kubuntu desktop, a ubuntu file server, and a windows 
> desktop, how can I configure the kubuntu desktop and win11 desktop to 
> share files on my ubuntu file server?
>
> ChatGPT says I should use Samba for both Linux and Windows.
>
> What is the advantage of using a NAS like TrueNAS over SMB?
>
> Thanks!!
> Keith



More information about the PLUG-discuss mailing list