new thread: QoS, latency, bandwidth and the FCC/net neutrality debate

Herminio Hernandez Jr. herminio.hernandezjr at gmail.com
Tue Nov 28 07:44:10 MST 2017


I do not what you are getting at? Yes we all look at Net Neutrality through the lens of our assumptions on how the economy should be built. I am sure many would believe that government should a significant role is managing and others not. Most of this thread has focused on that. 

I would love to discuss more the technical side of the debate. The first part of original post thread were the technical reasons why I felt NN was bad policy. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Nov 28, 2017, at 7:24 AM, Steve Litt <slitt at troubleshooters.com> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 22:52:04 -0700
> "Herminio Hernandez Jr. " <herminio.hernandezjr at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> First since I do not believe in 
> 
>> central planning 
>  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
>> I do not know what
>> competitors will once they have the freedom to offer services. This
>> what is awesome about the 
> 
> 
>> Free Market, 
>  ^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
>> if there is market that was
>> moved closed off now open they will find creative ways to provide
>> services. 
> 
> Looks to me like Net Neutrality is being used as a proxy for some
> much more generic theories.
> 
> SteveT
> 
> Steve Litt 
> November 2017 featured book: Troubleshooting: Just the Facts
> http://www.troubleshooters.com/tjust
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss at lists.phxlinux.org
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


More information about the PLUG-discuss mailing list