new thread: QoS, latency, bandwidth and the FCC/net neutrality debate
Herminio Hernandez Jr.
herminio.hernandezjr at gmail.com
Tue Nov 28 07:44:10 MST 2017
I do not what you are getting at? Yes we all look at Net Neutrality through the lens of our assumptions on how the economy should be built. I am sure many would believe that government should a significant role is managing and others not. Most of this thread has focused on that.
I would love to discuss more the technical side of the debate. The first part of original post thread were the technical reasons why I felt NN was bad policy.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 28, 2017, at 7:24 AM, Steve Litt <slitt at troubleshooters.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 22:52:04 -0700
> "Herminio Hernandez Jr. " <herminio.hernandezjr at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> First since I do not believe in
>
>> central planning
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>> I do not know what
>> competitors will once they have the freedom to offer services. This
>> what is awesome about the
>
>
>> Free Market,
> ^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>> if there is market that was
>> moved closed off now open they will find creative ways to provide
>> services.
>
> Looks to me like Net Neutrality is being used as a proxy for some
> much more generic theories.
>
> SteveT
>
> Steve Litt
> November 2017 featured book: Troubleshooting: Just the Facts
> http://www.troubleshooters.com/tjust
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss at lists.phxlinux.org
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
More information about the PLUG-discuss
mailing list