To Tux or not to Tux (VM's)
Nathan England
nathan at nmecs.com
Tue Apr 19 14:17:37 MST 2016
In all of my experiences with KVM vs VBox it has always come down to "do
I need graphical performance?"
VBox is stellar when it comes to running a windows vm. I use modern.ie
daily for testing old IE versions and current versions and it flat out
sucks on kvm.
But when it comes to running vm's to host a clients web platform for
development KVM runs circles around VBox.
--Nathan
On 2016-04-19 14:03, Matt Graham wrote:
> On 2016-04-19 12:12, Wayne D wrote:
>> 1 vote each for VirtualBox and QEMU
>> Pros and Cons of each?
>
> QEMU emulates more architectures, like ARM, and it doesn't have any
> associations with Orrible. Its user interface is much less polished
> than Virtualbox's. I think that a normal user would probably be more
> comfortable with Virtualbox for that reason. Not sure how the
> performance of VMs differs between QEMU and Virtualbox though.
More information about the PLUG-discuss
mailing list