Slackware vs Kubuntu

[Derek Trotter]

No.  The post I sent had the bcc field in it.  I put the address for the 
plug list in the bcc field. Someone else reposted the headers showing 
the message was sent to the plug list.  I'm guessing your mail program 
was looking for something in the to field.  There  was nothing there 
since I used bcc for the address.  Also I'm guessing that it ended up in 
your inbox because the filter wasn't expecting bcc and put it in the 
inbox.  I'm subscribed to other lists and this happens when someone 
would cc the list.

On 09/06/2013 12:13 AM, Robert Holtzm wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 01:02:30PM -0700, Brian Cluff wrote:
>> As you've probably figured out, the mailing list hates to be a BCCed
>> recipient.  It will always hold those messages for moderation.
>>
>> That being said, I let the message out of moderation because message
>> was on topic, so telling someone to go to hell because their message
>> says it came from undisclosed recipients is hardly productive.
>>
>> For future reference to everyone the list also hates it when it is
>> just one address in a whole bunch of recipients.  It will tolerate a
>> few, but after that those messages will also be held for moderation.
> Most of the replies got it wrong. I wasn't so much put out by the bcc as
> the fact that it showed up in my inbox. That means it must have been
> addressed to me personally.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss at lists.phxlinux.org
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

-- 
"I get my copy of the daily paper, look at the obituaries page, and if I’m not there, I carry on as usual."

Patrick Moore

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.phxlinux.org/pipermail/plug-discuss/attachments/20130906/9e300709/attachment.html>