Fedora Pays Microsoft Boot License fee.
Derek Trotter
expat.arizonan at gmail.com
Sat Jun 9 21:13:32 MST 2012
From the article mentioned in the original post:
Microsoft's practice is facilitated by the UEFI, or Unified Extensible
Firmware Interface, which allows a manufacturer to lock down the boot
process so that it will only work on their specified conditions.
What's to keep Microsoft from telling a manufacturer they must lock down
the machine so no other operating system will boot on it if they want
licenses to install windows on their machines?
On 6/9/2012 17:14, Eric Shubert wrote:
> I don't see how that would be a problem. Please reference exact part
> of the article which leads you to believe that.
>
> BL, there's a lot of misinformation about this. I don't think it's
> anything to be concerned about.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/pipermail/plug-discuss/attachments/20120609/46c094c4/attachment.html>
More information about the PLUG-discuss
mailing list