-- SPAM --Re: all mail marked as spam
Robert Holtzman
holtzm at cox.net
Sun Dec 2 17:01:43 MST 2012
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 01:07:32PM -0700, Lisa Kachold wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> The SPAM setting could be due to a variety of things. Do you have the spam
> statement on the return receipt or envelope?
>
> We need a code. Displaying the full header will show this?
Check http://pastebin.ca/2262568
>
> It is probably due to the DNS changes for the full name and the list
> configuration. It could also be due to the reverse ip address not matching
> the forward, which they usually mark as a dynamic or changing IP address
> (which they drop as a dynamic address used by script kiddie server rather
> than a real mail server.
Damn. Never thought of that. Only problem is that messages immediately
prior to the first one marked as spam was sent to the new address.
--
Bob Holtzman
If you think you're getting free lunch,
check the price of the beer.
Key ID: 8D549279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.phxlinux.org/pipermail/plug-discuss/attachments/20121202/bbcbf39d/attachment.pgp>
More information about the PLUG-discuss
mailing list