file size on disk vs used drastically different

[Shawn Badger]

Wow, that was some good information from everyone.
You got to love having people in the know just an email away!!!



On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Shawn Badger <badger.shawn at gmail.com>wrote:

> I came across a weird problem this morning. What would cause a file to be
> reported as 251M for used space and 1.3G for size on disk?
>
> [root at cc1lnx5 axprac]# ls -sh cafrap_1.dbf; ls -lh cafrap_1.dbf
> *251M* cafrap_1.dbf
> -rw-r----- 1 oraxprac axprac *1.3G* Apr 15 09:47 cafrap_1.dbf
> [root at cc1lnx5 axprac]#
>
>
> I have seen this to a smaller extent with some files but never a variance
> of this size.
> This file happens to be an Oracle 11G database table file.
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/pipermail/plug-discuss/attachments/20100415/1f80392b/attachment.htm>