OT: "A Blueprint to Stop Browser Attacks" [technologyreview.com "via" acm TechNews]

[Stephen]

just because one is paranoid does not mean they are not out to get you :-)

On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:38 PM, James Mcphee <jmcphe at gmail.com> wrote:
> Vigilant, but not paranoid.  XSS exists for a reason.  A better solution
> IMHO would be to require the remote content to be signed by a particular
> source or something along those lines.  Just my 2 cents.
>
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Stephen <cryptworks at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> given Lisa's previous rants I'm thinking both, and she would be right.
>>
>> it is in everyone's best interest to be vigilant.
>>
>> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Alex Dean <alex at crackpot.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > On May 15, 2009, at 12:34 PM, Lisa Kachold wrote:
>> >
>> >> it's IMPORTANT to realize that WE ALL MUST BE SECURITY EXPERTS
>> >
>> > Who is 'we'?  Programmers/admins/hackers, or the general public?


-- 
A mouse trap, placed on top of your alarm clock, will prevent you from
rolling over and going back to sleep after you hit the snooze button.

Stephen