One more Zoneminder/video question (camera resolution)

[Craig White]

On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 15:28 -0700, Jim March wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> First, I have ALL my issues with network access, apache security,
> DynDNS and the like sorted out.  Cool.
> 
> Remaining issue relates to camera resolution:
> 
> I have two Hauppauge BT878 camera interface PCI cards with a total of
> 7 cameras on them. The cameras are Swann cheapos; according to the
> specs on the box they're capable of 510x492 resolution (NTSC).
> 
> In Cheese I can use them at various resolutions (according to the
> "preferences" setting), with the highest at 768x480, although I don't
> believe it's actually running that resolution.  It's damned well
> better than 320x240 (ZoneMinder's max so far!).  There's also a
> 384x286 mode (in cheese) that is still clearly more than the max so
> far I can enter into Zoneminder of 320x240.  Even a bump to 384x286
> would help.
> 
> Telling Zoneminder to drive the cameras at any resolution other than
> 320x240 results in a black screen.
> 
> I'm assuming that all seven screens need to be set for the same
> resolution, and am testing it that way. Setting one screen per card
> different from 320x240 breaks the rest on that card.
> 
> My guess is that Cheese is getting some unknown different resolution
> from the cameras than anything I know about now.
> 
> Is there a command line statement in, say, Xawtv to try and get a
> specific resolution out of the cameras? Something similar to:
> 
> xawtv /dev/video0 res-640x480
> 
> ...or something?
> 
> Any idea why Zoneminder would be stuck hard at 320x240 when the
> cameras are obviously more capable??
> 
> Finally, does anybody have a clue as to which IP WiFi cameras might
> work well with Zoneminder?
----
zoneminder web site has a list of cameras and the relative success with
each one. I have only used a cheap Air? (forgot the brand name but it
was cheap, no name brand sold by Fry's and it worked fine) camera which
is a wireless camera and very cool actually. 

Craig


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.