Linus Torvalds Switches to Gnome

[Tuna]

Top-posting 'cuz you did...

I was very happy with KDE. Everything tied together, and it all felt 
very integrated. But then I sort of got bored of it.

Such tight integration can get to be suffocating. And it just feels 
weird when you start to use apps that don't quite fit in, like 
Thunderbird instead of K-Mail, so there's a hole in the fabric. One spot 
where everything doesn't quite line up...

I dropped KDE for icewm. Quite happy with it. It's enough but not too 
much. Cool themes too.

Joe Fleming wrote:
> I still like the lighter weight WMs over either Gnome or KDE, though I 
> understand their "out of the box" appeal. I used to use Openbox when I 
> was running Gentoo back in the day and it was amazing. When I switched 
> to Ubuntu it came with Gnome, and since I was already a lazy Linux user 
> by then (which is why I left Gentoo in the first place), I left it at 
> that. I ran Xubuntu and I absolutely loved how fast Xfce ran, but there 
> were just enough little loose ends to make me switch back to Ubuntu 
> after a couple weeks. I have a friend that did some amazing things with 
> fvwm, but it seems like a lot of tweaking before you get it right. I ran 
> KDE3 for a little while too, but I though it was too much like windows 
> and it wasn't responsive enough for me.
> 
> I really hope KDE4 finds its bearing in 4.2 or some later release. The 
> ideas behind it are pretty revolutionary, just too bad it was so poorly 
> implemented. I had planned to try it out, but then I read so much bad 
> press I figured I'd wait for a bit. One of these days I get back to 
> Openbox/Fluxbox though, I swear it!
> 
> -Joe
> 
> Craig White wrote:
>> On Sun, 2009-01-25 at 09:54 -0700, James Finstrom wrote:
>>   
>>> I would say kde4 was the vista of kde. To many changes and to much
>>> flair pushed on people with no real classic mode. I got kde4 working
>>> 90% the way I wanted but there were still some things that I would
>>> look cross eyed at.
>>>
>>>     
>> ----
>> I believe that the saying goes...if you want to make an omelet, you have
>> to break some eggs
>>
>> They had to move from QT3 to QT4 at some point. This definitely broke a
>> lot of code and they decided that KDE 4 had to be a complete re-write
>> from top to bottom. They decided to re-write the rules of a Desktop and
>> everything including the desktop itself is a Plasmoid.
>>
>> I suspect that most of the negativity comes from two things...
>>
>> - expectations and most of them are the habits acquired from years of
>> using GUI based systems and dropping files on the desktop. This is only
>> supported in a very crude way.
>>
>> - early, often release...the only way to get bugs fixed is to get people
>> using it. KDE developers decided that the only way forward was to
>> concentrate solely on new development and abandoned the KDE-3 codebase
>> because updating it would severely drain their resources. This left
>> packagers on the various distro's with the choice of going with the new
>> KDE-4 or hanging on with KDE-3 with no new development.
>>
>> Clearly the concept of release early and often is a mainstay of Linux in
>> general so yes, there is growing pain and it would have been smarter of
>> Linus not to turn it into a popularity contest because if anyone should
>> understand the concept of release early and often, it should be Linus.
>>
>> Craig
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------
>> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss at lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
>> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>>
>>
>>   
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss at lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss