****Re: Linux Administration - Users in (any) database howto/why...
Lisa Kachold
lisakachold at obnosis.com
Fri Jan 2 08:37:43 MST 2009
I agree completely that LDAP as a standard, especially with Postgresql LFS authentication (including web systems scalability) is a viable, already engineered solution that will do what he needs.
If he follows the HowTo's initially, he should be able to get this solution up and running and be able to scale systems as he goes along. Once he pokes it a few times, he will catch on. One doesn't need to go deep into the mechanics and embrace the complexity immediately? Also, LDAP has an added benefit of being able to convert trivially to Open Directory management, so he could actually have the WINDOWS ADMINS DO USER MAINTENANCE!!!!
www.Obnosis.com | http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Citations:obnosis | (503)754-4452
January PLUG HackFest = Kristy Westphal, AZ Department of Economic Security Forensics @ UAT 1/10/09 12-3PM
> Subject: Re: ****Re: Linux Administration - Users in (any) database howto/why...
> From: craigwhite at azapple.com
> To: plug-discuss at lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 09:36:32 -0700
>
> On Thu, 2009-01-01 at 11:24 -0500, kitepilot at kitepilot.com wrote:
> > I think that LDAP is overkill for my application.
> > My users will authenticate only in/for one server, and probably to either
> > update a WEB site or drop/retrieve e-mail.
> >
> > Some users may have WEB sites, some users may have e-mail, some users may be
> > signed up in the wireless network, and some users may have any combination
> > of those services, but those details can be easily stored at the database
> > level.
> > Even if I split some functionality among various servers.
> > I hope... :)
> > Thanks!
> > Enrique
> >
> > PS: LDAP stuff:
> > http://www.ucalgary.ca/it/directories/identity/ldap-pam
> ----
> LDAP is overkill when considering only one purpose. The value of LDAP is
> portability, lots of clients understand how to speak the language
> including many authentication systems and there is built-in replication.
>
> Once you decide that symmetry of UID's, GID's and passwords across
> systems has considerable value, LDAP becomes the way to go.
>
> Add in things like shared contacts/address books and automatic NFS
> mounts, e-mail routing/aliases are terrific bonuses.
>
> Craig
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss at lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
_________________________________________________________________
It’s the same Hotmail®. If by “same” you mean up to 70% faster.
http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_broad1_122008
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/pipermail/plug-discuss/attachments/20090102/85877c49/attachment.htm
More information about the PLUG-discuss
mailing list