OT: Handling Politics the plug-discuss way?
Ryan Rix
phrkonaleash at gmail.com
Sun Aug 2 22:20:41 MST 2009
Group,
Are these political discussions (examples: the second half of Re: Guess
What, when I relabelled unsuccesfully, and whatever happened to the
Geeky/entrepreneurial thread) detracting from the point of this list (which
is to discuss GNU/Linux and Free Software, and not necessarily to discuss
the economy, the government, or conspiracies about whether or not our duly
elected President was an American or not) and in general daunting for people
who may be new listers/Linuxers?
Hans agrees with me (via a quick discussion in the IRC channel) that these
discussions in general detract from the list, and make the non-political-
flame-war discussions less active/less... what is the word... visible, so I
think that something should be done, or at least a discussion should take
place about it.
I see a few options:
1) We leave it here and do nothing. Most email clients have the ability to
filter on subject/topic of a discussion, so those who didn't want to
see/deal with/get drug into these discussions could easily filter them out.
We could create a new topic heading, like we have for OT: (politics: or
something, when someone posts something politically kinda sorta related),
allowing those who want to take part in these discussions to do so, while
the others are safely shielded from them. The problem with this is that new
users will still see these discusions taking place, which could, imo be very
detrimental to their joining this community/getting the help with a question
they may need/just feeling comfortable. But of course, this is easy enough
to do and leaves the work for the users who don't like said discussions to
take care of.
2) Create another list for these mails. The problem with this idea is that
(imo) mailman has no easy way to control WHERE messages between two
different lists go, so I think that it could be hard to transition between
the two lists when a discussion does eventually go OT-Political. This would
rely mostly on the good will and rememberance of the posters, which in the
experience of the last few OT-Political threads has given me the impression
that this will NOT work.
3) We moderate OT threads. My personal opinion is that the best way to keep
flame wars down is to moderate. Not so much eliminate the posts that may
incite these political discussions but to put a long enough delay on the
posts that it hampers the quick reply-reply-reply-reply that usually is what
completely derails thoughtful discussion. If users are given the instant
chance to write a quick retort to a discussion and have that instantly
posted to a hundred people who may or may not have the same idealogy
basically causes a thread to go haywire in a matter of hours. With a
sufficient delay in these posts being sent to the group, this haywiring can
be pushed out to a day or two, hopefully alleviating any flame wars which
may develop. Most of the wars that take place on p-d are about a day or two
long at most anyways.
4) We forbid it. I think that this is the WORST option, but an option
nonetheless. I am not in favor of censorship at all, but if things get bad
enough we could do this. It would probably have to fall back to #3.
My personal preference is #3, but that gives someone an extra job, and I
don't think Hans should have to do it himself. A board of moderators be
elected perhaps? Is there any way to crowdsource it? If this was a forum
rather than a mailing list (which I don't support at all!) we could add a
score/rating system, but I don't think that this is possible via e-mail.
Thanks and best,
Ryan Rix
--
---
Ryan Rix
(623)-826-0051
* LG loves czech girls.
<vincent> LG: do they have additional interesting "features" other girls
don't have? ;)
-- #Debian
http://hackersramblings.wordpress.com | http://twitter.com/phrkonaleash
XMPP: phrkonaleash at gmail.com | MSN: phrkonaleash at yahoo.com
AIM: phrkonaleash | Yahoo: phrkonaleash
IRC: PhrkOnLsh at irc.freenode.net/#srcedit,#teensonlinux,#plugaz and
countless other FOSS channels.
More information about the PLUG-discuss
mailing list