OT: L33Tspeak "spelling" (was: Re: The .bash_history that Never Heard Anything at All)

[keith smith]

That is exactly what they want you to do.  Give up your rights because you feel it is in the best interest of everyone.  

Why do you think our founding fathers passed the Bill of Rights?  Because they had first hand knowledge of what it was like to live in a time absent rights.

------------------------

Keith Smith

--- On Thu, 4/30/09, Lisa Kachold <lisakachold at obnosis.com> wrote:

From: Lisa Kachold <lisakachold at obnosis.com>
Subject: Re: OT: L33Tspeak "spelling" (was: Re: The .bash_history that Never  Heard Anything at All)
To: schwartz at acm.org, "Main PLUG discussion list" <plug-discuss at lists.plug.phoenix.az.us>
Date: Thursday, April 30, 2009, 1:52 PM

Linux, like intelligence, is ageless.

Territorial coming of age wars fought via flinging personal critique, like duels, are best done in private, in the early morning.


On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Mike Schwartz <mike.l.schwartz at gmail.com> wrote:

> spelling words 'your' way [...] 
Oh, you are probably referring to the word "seekrit" - 
...and stuff like that? (& maybe the double "r" in "Herroes"?)

The "L33T" article, at    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L33T or even    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L337

clearly talks about stuff like this; -- e.g., under "== Vocabulary ==", it has a sub-section "Terminology and common misspellings";  but -- (probably more to the point!) -- under "== History ==" it says, in part, 

<< "One theory is that it was developed to defeat text filters [...] However, creative misspellings [...] were also a way to attempt to indicate one was knowledgeable about the culture of computer users [...] " >>

-- 
Mike Schwartz    
Glendale  AZ 
schwartz at acm.org

On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 4:58 AM, mike havens <bmike1 at gmail.com> wrote:


tuna, I thought you were about my age.... not of the age where spelling words 'your' way was acceptable.



On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Andrew "Tuna" Harris <tuna at supertunaman.com> wrote:



Herroes



There are some seekrit things that I would rather not have my

.bash_history knowing. Is there a way to set rules that prevent commands

containing a certain word like, say, "angry_watermelon" from being stored?



Also, are things that are sent to standard out logged anywhere?

---------------------------------------------------

PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss at lists.plug.phoenix.az.us

To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:

http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss-- 
:-)~MIKE~(-:




---------------------------------------------------

PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss at lists.plug.phoenix.az.us

To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:

http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

---------------------------------------------------

PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss at lists.plug.phoenix.az.us

To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:

http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss



-- 
www.obnosis.com (503)754-4452

"Contradictions do not exist." A. Rand


-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss at lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/pipermail/plug-discuss/attachments/20090430/f9006e86/attachment.htm