RIAA v Howell cleanup

[Craig White]

On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 16:41 -0700, Chris Gehlker wrote:
> On Jan 12, 2008, at 4:26 PM, Craig White wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 14:47 -0700, Chris Gehlker wrote:
> >
> >> Please try to stop seeing everything through the filter of which side
> >> you think people are on. It leads you to silly conclusions such as
> >> that Fisher and the EFF agree. Fisher and the EFF are both on  
> >> Howell's
> >> side but their view of the case is entirely different. This is not
> >> subtile and it doesn't require a background in IP law to see it. One
> >> only needs to read the  Fisher article and the EFF filing side by  
> >> side
> >> without lettings one's prejudices blind him to what they are saying.
> > ----
> > my filter presently causes me to refuse to engage in debate with  
> > someone
> > that indulges in opinions of the moment...
> >
> > My evidence...
> > http://lists.plug.phoenix.az.us/lurker/message/20080107.190030.662d8c8e.en.html
> >
> > Your first message (10:31 AM)
> > http://lists.plug.phoenix.az.us/lurker/message/20080107.165441.01830b28.en.html
> >
> > Your second message (12:10 PM)
> > http://lists.plug.phoenix.az.us/lurker/message/20080107.183310.2a366158.en.html
> >
> > Your defense (because I'd like to think I'm fair)
> > http://lists.plug.phoenix.az.us/lurker/message/20080108.001929.ab16330c.en.html
> 
> Your citations are totally non-responsive to the issue at hand. I'll  
> take that as a concession.
----
Question: are you an attorney or just trying to come off as one?

Yes, I concede your points if that's what you want.

Craig