IPCOP

[Craig White]

On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 12:07 -0700, Mike Schwartz wrote:
> On 2/7/07, ssjgolleta <ssjgolleta at anima-web.us> wrote:
>         Anyone here has any experience with IPCOP?
>         
>         I'm trying to set up a firewall using IPCOP and 3 network
>         cards. I'm
>         testing the firewall at the moment from inside the network so
>         its
>         plugged to a network switch instead of the modem (for the
>         moment). 
>         
>         After configuring the firewall here is my set up:
>         Green(eth0)-MailScanner warning: numerical links are often
>         malicious:192.168.0.1 with dhcp server installed
>         Orange(eth1) - MailScanner warning: numerical links are often
>         malicious:192.168.1.1
>         Red(eth2) - MailScanner warning: numerical links are often
>         malicious:10.0.0.1
>         
>         I have Red plugged in to my network switch, Green to a small
>         switch, and
>         Orange to another switch. So far, when I log into the server
>         itself I
>         can ping google.com fine. When I plug a computer to the switch
>         on the
>         green, I can't see the server or even get an IP. Do I need to
>         have
>         anything special like a crossover cable or anything?
>         
>         --------------------------------------------------- 
>         PLUG-discuss mailing list -
>         PLUG-discuss at lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
>         To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change  you mail settings:
>         http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
> 
> just FYI:
> I read Craig's reply to this, before I ever saw this message.
> (See above).
> I was wondering why...;  now, I know.
> 
> Within my mailbox on Google, the reply from Carig showed 
> up in my "INBOX", but for some reason 
> (I do not know why),
> this original question [see above] got stored by gmail
> in to my folder labeled for "Spam".
> 
> I don't know whether there is anything you can / anything you 
> "need to" do about that, ssjgolleta;
> so this is just "F Y I".
> 
> I considered sending this off-list, (somewhat OT perhaps),
> but some of our PLUG experts might know a thing or 2
> about this, and be able to comment. 
----
I don't know how Google scored it - there didn't seem to be anything
amiss or that would cause it to score a big number with spamassassin but
generally, spamassassin configuration would include the scoring
information in the headers if it scored high enough to be flagged as
spam. Thus if you want to contribute information back to the OP - you
should include the spamassassin scores which will indicate which
rulesets marked it as spam.

Craig