(slashdot, and others:) " Microsoft's New Permissive License [...]"

[Mike Schwartz]

by no means was I trying to say that I "like" it.
Just saying that, (as news), this might be interesting.
-- 
Mike Schwartz
Glendale  AZ
schwartz at acm.org
Mike.L.Schwartz at gmail.com

On 8/19/07, Tuna <tuna at supertunaman.com> wrote:
>
> Well in my honest opinion...
>
> BULL. CRAP.
>
> "(D) If you distribute any portion of the software in source code form,
> you may do so only under this license by including a complete copy of
> this license with your distribution. If you distribute any portion of
> the software in compiled or object code form, you may only do so under a
> license that complies with this license."
>
> That does NOT sound Open Source to me.
>
> Mike Schwartz wrote:
> > You may have already seen this.  It was on "/.":
> >     http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/07/08/18/1636213.shtml
> > and other places, e.g.:
> >
> >
> http://www.nabble.com/For-Approval%3A-Microsoft-Permissive-License-tf4249705.html
> > --
> > Mike Schwartz
> > [...]
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > PLUG-discuss mailing list - [...]
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - [...]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/pipermail/plug-discuss/attachments/20070819/dad3ed35/attachment.htm