Pointless rant: Red Hat Enterprise Server sucks!

[Dan Lund]

This argument has gone on since the beginning of Red Hat being the
"Windows" of Linux.  Thankfully Red Hat has done a bit of shifting in
their strategy and become less like that.
It smacks of remnants of that argument, just completely backwards...
back then it was people saying that it's better to edit the files
directly versus using a tool.  Now we have someone saying that there's
not enough tools?
lol


On 8/9/07, Craig White <craigwhite at azapple.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 16:03 -0700, Kurt Granroth wrote:
> > Craig White wrote:
> > > Shame on you Kurt for thinking that Red Hat should pander to your SuSE
> > > driven expectations.
> >
> > Yes, shame on me for expecting that Red Hat behave like an OS worthy of
> > being the class leader.
> ----
> somewhat argumentative considering that you are not using an installer
> but rather an image created by others. The reality is, changing
> hostname, etc. is a rather simple process for those who know Red Hat
> topology and for those who are reduced to Linux server management via
> Yast, it's going to be painful. From your perspective, I can see where
> you're coming from. From a Red Hat perspective, you bring a limited
> skill set that they are unlikely to satisfy regardless of their efforts.
> Installing X and the various system-config-*utils* or Webmin are the
> most reasonable options.
-- 
"Courage is like love; it must have hope to nourish it."
-Napoleon Bonaparte