Processor speed

[Michael Havens]

I'm in West Mesa. What could I do with
this stuff? Build a new board? Or will this processor/ram fit in this  
board?? Whatever the outcome of this is I really appreciate the offer!


On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 10:13:48 -0700, keith smith <klsmith2020 at yahoo.com>  
wrote:

> I will have an AMD500 K6-2 (IIRR), ATX motherboard, and possibly some  
> RAM  available in about 2 weeks.  I'm in east Mesa.  If that helps.
>
> I am running Fedora Core 5 on this AMD500 / 384Mb RAM and 2 - 20Gig  
> HD's.  Running X right out of the box is ok.
>
> With a little tuning I think it could rock!
>
> Unless your project is to get the 100Mhz sys running.
>
> Michael Havens <bmike101 at cox.net> wrote: lshw says that my hd is 38 GB  
> and that my processor is clocked to 100Mhz.
> It also says that the size of it is 500Mhz
>
>       *-cpu
>            description: CPU
>            product: AMD-K6(tm) 3D processor
>            vendor: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD]
>            physical id: 4
>            bus info: cpu at 0
>            version: 5.8.12
>            slot: Socket 7
>            size: 500MHz
>            width: 32 bits
>            clock: 100MHz
>            capabilities: fpu fpu_exception wp vme de pse tsc msr mce cx8
> pge mmx syscall 3dnow k6_mtrr
>
>
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 20:48:47 -0700, JT Moree
> wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Michael Havens wrote:
>>> I know overclocking the processor is bad but I was thinking that it
>>> might
>>> be underclocked. How do I see this?
>> not neccessarily bad.  not needed with modern systems being rather but
>> some people just like to push the limits.
>>
>>> things are slugish. Perhaps I should overclock the processor since I
>>> rarely start those pss and things would start quicker thereby reducing
>>> the
>>> use of the processor. What do you think about this idea?
>>
>> since you have a k6-3 i don't recommend overclocking.  Those procs were
>> already clocked pretty high bc amd was playing catch-up with intel.
>>
>> I do agree with other posters about the bus.  get the bus speed up as
>> high as you can where the system is stable.  Some of the k6 cpus even
>> used 75Mhz and 83Mhz bus speeds as a standard.  That's about as high as
>> you can hope for.  What's your processor speed?
>>
>> Be careful though, some systems and components from this era don't like
>> running at those bus speeds.
>>
>> And get a faster hard drive if possible but that probably means spending
>> money and that's a no go for this system.  Better to put $$ towards a
>> new one.
>>
>> And lastly you can always install gentoo so that you optimize code for
>> k6 instead of running 386 code.  How big is your hard drive?
>>
>> - --
>> JT Morée
>> PC Xperience, Inc.
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>>
>> iD8DBQFFblSf1JwGi/ukQqERAjAhAKDxOsUUwNKUdR44W7EySsl3W0rpTwCgvT69
>> Nb6xItCL9ug5CxNj295rY14=
>> =jopj
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>
>
>



-- 
:~)MIKE(~: