Novel and Microsoft

[Kevin Brown]

>> Looks to my like Novell is trying to provide the FS community assurance
>> that it is still a member in good standing.  It will be interesting to
>> see how this all turns out.

> given what I've seen in their "nosrc" dirs on the mirrors lately, I am 
> beginning to have my doubts (50 packages of which 42 are definitely GPL'ed. a 
> violation of section 7 if I've ever seen one).

If asked for the source to those packages do they direct the user to the 
software writers page?  Last time I checked the GPL it only required 
that source be easily available upon request which would include a 
minimal fee for things like burning a CD to send to the customer in 
question.