Blocking bittorrent?
Craig White
craigwhite at azapple.com
Tue Mar 14 17:54:12 MST 2006
On a residential account ($39 per month, dhcp), they definitely do
packet filtering...but I don't think it goes beyond ports 25, 80,
137-139 & 445
I will report back next week on bittorrent because FC-5 is supposed to
release 3/20 (Mr. Coffman will go into a heavy pant just reading this)
and I'll see upload/download but I probably have to fix my router to
permit people to download.
Craig
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 14:56 -0700, Robert L Chavez wrote:
> I was using bittorrent just fine with a 25k upload this last weekend.
> I don't use the default port, and I have forwarding setup through my
> linksys router.
>
> Would/Does cox actually do packet filtering? I know this would make
> me very upset since I get my anime fix through bittorrent.
>
> -Rob
>
> On 3/14/06, Josh Zeidner <jjzeidner at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> COX doesnt just block the port outright, I believe they do
> packet inspection
> and block based on protocol. This is a very controversial
> thing ISPs are
> doing right now, plays into the whole Net Neutrality
> thing. My COX
> connection stops working on a regular basis. Time to
> outsource COX. jmz
>
>
> On Tuesday 14 March 2006 12:56, Craig White wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 12:49 -0700, der.hans wrote:
> > > Am 12. Mar, 2006 schwätzte Carl Parrish so:
> > > > How can you tell if your ISP is blocking bittorrent
> uploads? I've
> > > > noticed that on the last 6 or so torrent downloads that
> there hasn't
> > > > been *any* upload traffic. I find that hard to believe.
> So how can I
> > > > find out if this is cox or not?
> > >
> > > Move to DSL or Cox Business and stop paying for restricted
> access to the
> > > Net :).
> > >
> > > I noticed the other day that Cox seems to also not provide
> results from
> > > MX lookups :(. No warning that they're dropping the
> requests either.
> >
> > ----
> > # nslookup
> >
> > > server MailScanner warning: numerical links are often
> malicious:68.2.16.30
> >
> > Default server: MailScanner warning: numerical links are
> often malicious:68.2.16.30
> > Address: 68.2.16.30#53
> >
> > > www.azapple.com
> >
> > Server: MailScanner warning: numerical links are
> often malicious:68.2.16.30
> > Address: 68.2.16.30#53
> >
> > Non-authoritative answer:
> > Name: www.azapple.com
> > Address: MailScanner warning: numerical links are often
> malicious:204.11.161.11
> >
> > > set type=mx
> > > azapple.com
> >
> > Server: MailScanner warning: numerical links are
> often malicious:68.2.16.30
> > Address: 68.2.16.30#53
> >
> > Non-authoritative answer:
> > azapple.com mail exchanger = 10
> mail-015.phx01.alevelhigher.com.
> > azapple.com mail exchanger = 20
> mail-020.phx01.alevelhigher.com.
> >
> > Authoritative answers can be found from:
> > azapple.com nameserver = ns2.alevelhigher.com.
> > azapple.com nameserver = ns1.alevelhigher.com.
> >
> > > exit
> >
> > I'm on a cox 'residential' system (dhcp)
> >
> > definitely ports 25 and 80 and I am quite certain netbios
> ports are
> > blocked here but I don't know of anything else.
> >
> > Craig
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > PLUG-discuss mailing list -
> PLUG-discuss at lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
> >
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list -
> PLUG-discuss at lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>
>
>
> --
> Robert L Chavez
> XP is my last Microsoft OS, there are alternatives
> http://fedora.redhat.com/
> http://www.apple.com/
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss at lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
More information about the PLUG-discuss
mailing list