(Slightly OT) Forwarding email: inline vs as attachment

[Dan Lund]

Other than that, it's all semantics.
It's vi vs. emacs
It's mac vs. pc

Just something else for everyone to say that their way is better.

--Dan

On 7/13/06, Nathan England <nathan at paysonlinux.org> wrote:
>
> If it is inappropriate or a warning is needed before the user reads it?
>
> On Thursday 13 July 2006 06:49, Eric "Shubes" wrote:
> > I seem to remember reading something some time ago that led me to
> > believe that forwarding "as attachment" was preferable (somehow better)
> > than forwarding "inline". I may be mistaken.
> >
> > In the Thunderbird tutorial, I see this:
> > Unless you have specific reasons not to include an email forward inline,
> > you should let emails be forwarded inline, by consideration for the
> > recipient: scrolling down is a lot easier than double clicking an email
> > attachment.
> >
> > Can anyone explain why one would want to forward as attachment?
> >
> > TIA
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Nathan England
> Tonto Apache Tribe
> Information Security Specialist
> nengland at tontoapache.com
> (928) 978.2513
> http://10.0.1.2
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Nathan England
> PaysonLinux User Group
> nathan at paysonlinux.org
> http://www.paysonlinux.org/
>
> Software Development
> Website Development
> Linux Administration
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss at lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change  you mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>


-- 
"Courage is like love; it must have hope to nourish it."
-Napoleon Bonaparte