jobs & salaries

[June Tate]

On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 06:27:52PM -0700, Kurt Granroth wrote:
> And don't even TRY to compare the  
> VS debugger with gdb.  gdb may be the most powerful debugger under  
> Unix, but it comes across as a "hobby" debugger compared to the VS  
> debugger.  gdb is so unreliable and unintuitive to use that I will  
> nearly always prefer 'printf' style debugging under Linux rather than  
> fighting with gdb.  The VS debugger is rock-solid reliable and  
> everything makes perfect sense when using it.

Perhaps, but are you comparing the UI to UI experience, or the
debugging engine? I've been using GDB for nearly a year now through
a companion program called DDD that is bar none the best debugging
environment I've found (even compared to VS). GDB provides extremely
powerful and flexible debugging -- but it's default text UI really
sucks. Try giving one of it's frontends like DDD a try -- once I did I
never looked back.

-- 
June Tate * http://www.theonelab.com * june at theonelab.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.plug.phoenix.az.us/pipermail/plug-discuss/attachments/20050916/7d07351c/attachment-0001.pgp