postnuke vs. php-nuke

[Gordon]

I can't speak for the group (the plug site will be moving to another cms 
soon from what I've heard), but I use postnuke for most of my sites 
because it has a relatively good api and it's actively developed by more 
than one person (which was a main reson for the split in the first 
place).  I'm not going to start a war on which is better, because 
everything has pros and cons, but IMO, it's a lot easier to create 
modules for postnuke once you know the api functions.  The latest 
versions of postnuke also utilizes the smarty templating system for both 
themes and modules.

The lazy programmer will probably go for phpnuke because there are less 
hoops to jump through to create a module (but I don't think they have a 
template/cache system yet).

Postnuke .760 will probably be released within the next month (I hope).

If you have specific questions about postnuke, feel free to ask me off-list.

   Gordon

biggie smalls wrote:
> i noticed PLUG is using postnuke for their site. 
>  
> i am curious how postnuke compares to phpnuke and why you guys chose 
> postnuke.
>  
> ANY FEEDBACK IS GREATLY APPRECIATED !!!
>  
> thanks.
>