Worth while bash hack (makes history even more valuable)
der.hans
plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
Wed, 12 Mar 2003 23:30:09 -0700 (MST)
Am 12. Mar, 2003 schw=E4tzte Kevin Brown so:
> Since RH is good for newbies to cut their teeth on and rm -i is only an
> alias when running as root, I think it is a good idea. I can do rm as a
> normal user and it doesn't ask, but do it as root and the system makes
> sure that is what I want to do. If you want it to stop asking, just rm -=
f
> as root.
Even then, I'd rather see them, for interactive shells, alias rm to the
empty string or a script that says "use rmi" than have them alias rm to "rm
-i".
By using "rm -f" I also get files that are write-protected, so it's not the
same command and the change has again hosed behavior. There's a reason for
the -f flag and it's not because someone had a prediction that Red Hat woul=
d
come around 20 years later and screw up rm ;-).
Ah well, only takes one boot to fix the problem for me :).
ciao,
der.hans
--=20
# https://www.LuftHans.com/ http://www.TOLISGroup.com/
# "Science is like sex: sometimes something useful comes out, but
# that is not the reason we are doing it." -- Richard Feynman