Good Bye Linux
Gary Nichols
plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
Mon, 16 Jun 2003 12:06:42 -0400 (EDT)
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Tom Achtenberg wrote:
> After several weeks of unsuccessful effort to install Linux on a desktop
> I am giving up and returning to more profitable activities. I have
> tried 3 different distributions (Mandrake 9.1, Red Hat 8.0 and Knoppix
> 3.2) all with much hassle and no success. Some on this list have
> alluded that I have a hardware problem yet the same PC was rock solid on
> Windows 98 SE.
Somehow I missed this discussion. What's wrong? What doesn't work?
Perhaps I'll have to scan the archives later.
> Last night I installed Windows 2000 server on it with no
> problems whatsoever. The evidence leads me to conclude that Linux has
> some small niche areas it is good at, as a desktop OS it is simply not
> there.
Linux is just like every other OS in existence. Some hardware it likes,
some hardware it doesn't. Ever try to load Windows 98SE on some early
Compaq gear? YIKES! I still have an imprint of a desk on my forehead.
> Yes, if you are geeky enough and have the time to spend editing
> config files by hand and recompiling every app so it works on your
> machine it may be fun. I need to spend my time in more productive
> environments.
K. Perhaps this task should have been delegated.
> Using Dereks criteria when he labeled FoxPro a "toy"
> database I have to say Linux is a "toy" OS.
Not touching this - missed this discussion too apparently.
> Good for specific narrow applications but run the whole enterprise on
it? No way.
Quick. Somebody call Google, eBay and Amazon... they need to remove Linux
immediately. :-)
I understand your frustration. This is similar to my first experiences
installing IRIX. *shudders*