mysql vs. postgresql
Tom Achtenberg
plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
Sun, 15 Jun 2003 09:48:21 -0700
Derek, have you ever used VFP? It sounds like you never have. It is not a
toy database. Access is but not VFP. As for it being only for small shops,
American Express, Intel, the State of Arizona and many others all have VFP
applications running. Not exactly small shops.
-----Original Message-----
From: plug-discuss-admin@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
[mailto:plug-discuss-admin@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us]On Behalf Of Derek
Neighbors
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 7:42 AM
To: plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
Subject: Re: mysql vs. postgresql
On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 07:27, Trent Shipley wrote:
> I thought VFP was built over the JET database engine just like Access?
>
> How is VFP an upgrade from Access?
It's not. It is just like Access, Paradox, Dbase and friends. A "toy"
database. Designed to be light enough to distribute with applications
with zero/minimal licensing issues for small development shops.
--
Derek Neighbors
GNU Enterprise
http://www.gnuenterprise.org
derek@gnue.org
Was I helpful? Let others know:
http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=dneighbo
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.489 / Virus Database: 288 - Release Date: 6/10/2003