redhat tries apt-get

[Don Harrop]

The only beaf I've got agains apt-get is the versions of the packages.  They always seem to be slightly more dated than thier rpm counterparts or naturally the .tgz's...  Maybe I've just got an outdated server in my server list?

Don


I would guess it was a unintentional flame, or it could
have been intentional.  I don't think it is the thing that
will make me drop Debian and go back to Redhat, though thats
for sure.  I am sure it will be some time still before this
new system will be able to catch up to the matureness of apt.

Bill Warner

> On Sep 21,  8:35am, Craig White wrote:
> 
> Seems pretty clear that Debian is a committed free venture whereas > Redhat is
> > and apparently always will be a commercial enterprise. Their hope is to
> > commercialize added value. It may very well be the thing that kills apt.
>                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> I really don't understand this statement.  Would you care to clarify?
> 
> Kevin
> 
> ________________________________________________
> See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
> 
> Plug-discuss mailing list  -  Plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
> 



-- 
--
Bill Warner
Direct Alliance Corp.
Unix/Linux Admin.