performance question
Ted Gould
plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
06 Oct 2002 23:13:40 -0700
--=-6vD75n5pvcd8mYEteBYW
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The people that replied are correct about the ordering of events in the
kernels, but I don't think that's your issue. Judging by what you are
saying, you're probably running GNOME 1.4. In GNOME 1.4 there is
Nautilus 1.0, which is dog slow. I'd recommend upgrading to GNOME 2.0,
probably most easily done by upgrading to RedHat 8.0, and that should
'fix' the Nautilus issues.
I'm guessing (not that you explicitly stated it though) that you are
also concerned with how fast office applications load. The reason that
this is faster in XP is that the OS continually keeps office loaded.=20
There is a GNOME applet that will do this for StarOffice in Linux if
you'd like. It's really nice if you do a lot of office stuff, and you
have the RAM.
Have fun,
Ted
On Sun, 2002-10-06 at 19:53, Michael Knee wrote:
> Response time is the time from when I click on something until the expect=
ed
> response appears, such as from clicking on "Start Here" until the "Start
> Here" window appears.
>=20
> Mike
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Richard L. Proctor" <krycom1@cox.net>
> To: <plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us>
> Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 6:53 PM
> Subject: Re: performance question
>=20
>=20
> > On Sunday 06 October 2002 3:50 pm, Michael Knee wrote:
> > > I have a dual boot system, WindowsXP and RH7.3. Response time for XP=
is
> > > dramatically faster than for Linux, which is the opposite of what I
> would
> > > have expected. Has anyone else run into this?
> > >
> > > Each OS has it's own disk, and both disks are the same model (Western
> > > Digital, 80GB, 7200 rpm, 8MB cache):
> > >
> > > XP is on hda (primary master)
> > > Linux is on hdb (primary slave)
> > >
> > > I installed XP first, later I added the 2nd drive and Linux.
> > >
> > > Any ideas? Or does XP usually respond faster than Linux?
> > >
> > > Mike
> >
> > What do you mean response time, in response to what?
> >
> > --
> > Richard L. Proctor
> > Krystal Computer Services
> > PC Repairs & Upgrades
> > 480-699-3098
> > -=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=
=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-
> > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
> > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
> >
>=20
> -=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=
=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>=20
--=-6vD75n5pvcd8mYEteBYW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEABECAAYFAj2hJhQACgkQLE335pRPGp3tMACfdwyIZxpBiu1XJjz9kmHhJ4Xv
1/cAn3aBqItASDU0CnzV3yP1iMrI+ysl
=F81H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-6vD75n5pvcd8mYEteBYW--