(no subject)

[John (EBo) David]

"der.hans" wrote:
> 
> Am 08. Mar, 2002 schwätzte John (EBo) David so:
> 
> > go thought until you understand that the aliasing was done to prevent
> > DoH's!
> 
> I know why it was done. I still say it was the wrong solution. That's why I
> suggeste rmi, etc. If they were afraid people would just us rm, etc. they
> could've blocked those from being accessable. If they wanted to dosify
> things they could've use 'del', etc.

sounds like we could definiately have an interesting philisophical CLUI
debate...  Might be interesting at one of the next bandersnatches...

> > Have you ever done a:
> >
> >   rm -r * .o
> 
> Once. I learned :).

hahahaha... ahem...  understand ;-)

 EBo --