Iptables, FTP and firewall
Voltage Spike
plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
Wed, 10 Jul 2002 20:55:18 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 10 July 2002 18:36, der.hans wrote:
> The real question, though, is: do you really need ftp? Use http for anon
> downloading and ssh/scp/sftp for authorized uploading/downloading if you
> can.
Isn't there a larger overhead for http downloads (i.e. slower downloads)?
Don't http connections also have to come down the line in order? I know that
http is easier for the user to work with, but what kind of performance
penalty will you see for using it?
Just a curious mind. ;-)
- --
Voltage Spike
,,,
(. .)
- --ooO-(_)-Ooo--
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE9LQGppNoctRtUIRQRAlD3AJ4hogFd1CUXToqHgqtAj9M7B9RAjQCfQW0v
kOxvJEOB/UETlyjixTl3alI=
=a1/t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----