speakers?

der.hans plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
Sun, 7 Jul 2002 22:50:14 -0700 (MST)


moin, moin,

George Toft and Robert Bushman have, by the resources they've provided,
shown themselves to be the obvious speakers for tomorrow.

Admittedly, I might jump up as well, but mostly because I know PLUG, it's
members and what we do better than most.

We don't know what the format of the meeting will be. In any case this is
not an old time religious revival. We don't need hallelujahs or anything
else shouted out from the crowd. That makes it hard for us ( especially
those around the person shouting out ) to hear what Paul and his staff say.
It also makes us look bad. Small mutterings can be OK :), but just yelling
stuff interferes with what we're trying to do.

If it's an open mike session, please make sure that any questions you ask
are pertinent and not confrontational. We are not there to be angry or to
make the county angry. We are there because we have a percieved problem and
we want more information on the situation. We also want them to know we are
not happy with the percieved situation, but that does not imply that we're
angry. It does not call for confrontation. In fact, we want to help them.

The above, while not my opinion alone, is not necessarily representative of
all of the opinions in PLUG, so please consider it as advice and do with it
what you will.

ciao,

der.hans
-- 
#  https://www.LuftHans.com/
#  "Science is like sex: sometimes something useful comes out, but
#  that is not the reason we are doing it." -- Richard Feynman