OT: crappy OS's
Dr.G
plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
Mon, 1 Jul 2002 08:28:40 -0700
I'm sorry, but Windows 2000 is a VERY stable OS. No matter what ANY linux
fan may say, Win2k is an incredibly stable OS. Windows 98 was ok back int he
day, but it still sucked as far as reliability. 2K does not.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard L. Proctor" <krycom1@cox.net>
To: <plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us>
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 7:50 AM
Subject: Re: OT: crappy OS's
> On Monday 01 July 2002 1:00 am, robert jorgenson wrote:
> > sorry this is really off topic but i dont really have anywhere else to
ask,
> > was wondering if anyone had an old copy of win2k lying around they'd be
> > willing to sell for cheap(no job right now =/ ) Unfortunately i still
have
> > to run windows on my computer for various reasons and the only copy i
have
> > is a windows 98 first edition and it is so horrible. if anyone has
anything
> > you can send e-mail directly to me to keep OT mail off the list :)
>
> What makes you think that win2k is any better than 98?
>
> --
> Richard L. Proctor
> Krystal Computer Services
> PC Repairs & Upgrades
> www.krycom.com
> 480-699-3098
> ________________________________________________
> See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't
post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
>
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>