apache 1.3.24

Carl Parrish plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
23 Dec 2002 09:53:53 -0700


Depending on which version of Mozilla you use there are several tools
which will tell you how long it takes to load (with out having to go to
the logs). If you *do* find a mozilla problem with png please let me
know or submitt it to bugzilla. 

Carl 

On Sat, 2002-12-21 at 20:36, Kevin Brown wrote:
> The only thing that will rule out the server is if you get the same behavior on 
> a similar machine running those browsers.  I suspect the problem is in the 
> browser (all of them) when it comes to handling of pngs over jpgs or gifs.
> 
> Try loading just the png file from the server without it being part of a 
> webpage.  The logs should tell you how long it took to transfer the file to the 
> client.
> 
> > Well, text loads fast. The jpgs load instantly, but the pngs along side them 
> > take a while to load. I've tried it using mozilla 1.2, konq 3.0.4 and IE 5.5 
> > all with the same result. So I'm pretty sure it's apache.
> > 
> > any other ideas?
> > nathan
> 
> >>>I'm running apache 1.3.24 and I've noticed that on one of the websites I
> >>>am playing with jpg images load really fast, instantly, but the same
> >>>image in png take a considerable amount of time. The computer I'm looking
> >>>at the website is on the same lan as the web server, so there isn't a
> >>>downloading issue here. It's all 100/mbit.
> >>>
> >>>Any ideas why pngs would take so much longer?
> >>>
> >>>nathan
> 
> >>What make you think it's the server?
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change  you mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
-- 
Carl Parrish (cparrish@carlparrish.com)
http://www.carlparrish.com
---
Registered Linux User #295761 http://counter.li.org