Debian development branch - which do you use?

[Shawn Rutledge]

sid for me.  I haven't had anything horrible happen.  The worst problems
I had a while back were of the nature that if I upgraded one thing it
would try to force me to uninstall a bunch of stuff that I wanted to 
keep, because those packages depended on an older version of some 
library while the new thing depended on a newer version.  So I point apt
at sid but only upgrade things selectively.  At one point I had everything
upgraded, but not lately.

On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 02:00:17PM -0700, bob smith wrote:
> I was just curious as to what branch those who use
> debian are currently tracking. From reading polls and
> other articles it seems that most people use sid (for
> dekstop purposes not server use). I've heard some
> horror stories though of people not being able to boot
> after something going horribly wrong while tracking
> sid. Thoughts? 

-- 
  _______                   Shawn T. Rutledge / KB7PWD  ecloud@bigfoot.com
 (_  | |_)                       http://ecloud.org  kb7pwd@kb7pwd.ampr.org
 __) | | \________________________________________________________________