Insurer Considers Microsoft NT High-Risk
George Toft
plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
Wed, 30 May 2001 21:19:56 -0700
Cost of server was not considered. I had to narrow the focus of the
research to SPARC, Intel, and Alpha, which, by their nature, also
becomes close to irrelevant when you consider downtime. For example,
a telecom that my wife worked for used NT4. They had a glitch that
took two days to fix. Meanwhile, 150 employees sat idle. They paid
over $20K in wages because they chose to use cheaper hardware and NT.
That $20K would have paid for a pretty decent Sparc box, or even an
AIX box.
George
Trent Shipley wrote:
>
> What did you use as a depreciation schedule. I have seen a figure as high
> as 7 years to fully depreciate a computer. However, my impression is that
> by the end of three years most computers have been demoted to an auxiliary
> role. That is, they get handed down. The middle aged server becomes some
> engineer's workstation; the executive's old computer gets handed to his
> secretary, and so on.
>
> The computer might survive five or six years in company service before being
> considered totally obsolete or relegated to being the fax server.
>
> I guess from the standpoint of accounting this isn't a problem. They say
> use linear depreciation over five years and that is about right. The
> problem is more political. The CEO reads that as an expected service life
> of five years then wants to know why the CIO wants new front-line computers
> in 30 months.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: plug-discuss-admin@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> > [mailto:plug-discuss-admin@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us]On Behalf Of George
> > Toft
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 6:55 AM
> > To: plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> > Subject: Re: Insurer Considers Microsoft NT High-Risk
> >
> >
> > "Cost" is very tricky. My thesis was on the Total Cost of Ownership
> > for Workgroup Servers, and the O/S cost is irrelevant.
>
> ________________________________________________
> See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
>
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss