More Kernel 2.4 Q's

[foodog]

Thanks, Craig.  That should be a big help :-)

I don't know if this answers Q#1, but maybe. I selected 'kernel
development' during install and got the following packages:

[root@zippy /root]# rpm -qva | grep kern
kernel-headers-2.4.2-2
kernel-2.4.2-2
kernel-source-2.4.2-2

I don't think that you'd need to install processor-specific RPMs since
menuconfig has a 'processor type and features' tab.  BTW, if you're
running X then 'make xconfig' is nicer than menuconfig, IMO - very
mouse-friendly anyway.

As to #8, I've always *assumed* that the settings that come up initially
when configuring a new kernel are the one's that were installed.  If
they're not, that'd explain some problems I've had.  Please let me know
if you find out.

Steve

Craig White wrote:
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: plug-discuss-admin@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> > [mailto:plug-discuss-admin@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us]On Behalf Of foodog
> > Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2001 11:13 AM
> > To: plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> > Subject: Re: More Kernel 2.4 Q's
> >
> >
> > Craig, I'm waiting for your answers too.  I tried to build a new RH 7.1
> > kernel to include IPX support but that portion's broken.  I found some
> > online discussion of it, including a kernel patch but it's not RH
> > specific.  IIRC, it's a fix for 2.4-3 instead of 2.4-2 (plus I've never
> > done kernel patch voodoo).
> >
> > I think I can help with #4.  After I hose everything up, 'make mrproper'
> > *seems* to reset to the defaults.
> >
> > I've got a pretty sad record of getting a new kernel *and* the modules
> > to work.  I've occasionally just built everything I need into the
> > kernel.  I use the same build sequence, FWIW: make menuconfig followed
> > by  dep, clean, bzImage, modules, modules_install, install.  Also
> > experimented a bit with the linuxconf 'install new kernel' thing
> > followed by lilo instead of 'make install'.
> >
> > I hope someday to find kernel docs starting with "If you follow these
> > instructions it will always work..." :-)
> >
> ----
> I found some answers on the seawolf mailing list @ redhat - see below -
> seems to answer most of my questions 2 thru 7 - still looking for takers on
> 1 & 8.
> 
> Also apparently ipchains load as a module of iptables which is why other
> modules previously used by ipchains - namely the ip_masq_ftp, ip_masq_irc
> etc...won't work - and of course the ipmasqadm doesn't work either. So new
> question is anyone doing port forwarding with iptables yet?
> 
> -- Clipped from https://listman.redhat.com/pipermail/seawolf-list/ ---
> 
> >> > Or edit the top level Makerfile and change the
> >> > EXTRAVERSION line so the modules will install in
> >> > different directory, and the old ones remain
> >> > usable with the old kernel.
> >>
> >>  No no no ... this can make patches fail to apply.
> >>
> >>  Run the make command(s) with "EXTRAVERSION=-foo" on the command line
> >> instead (to give you vmlinuz-2.4.x-foo, say).
> >
> >Interesting! Can you give an example? where would this go in:
> >
> ># make dep clean bzImage modules modules_install
> 
> make EXTRAVERSION=-foo menuconfig
> make EXTRAVERSION=-foo dep bzImage modules modules_install
> 
> make clean isn't necessary from a fresh untar.
> 
> Also, if it is on SMP, use make -j2 or make -j4, etc..
> 
> Craig
> 
> ________________________________________________
> See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
> 
> PLUG-discuss mailing list  -  PLUG-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss