Redhat choosing Ext3fs for RH7.2

Mon, 27 Aug 2001 12:55:56 -0700 (MST)

I think that this "much" of an upgrade will wait until I have a reason to
power down the box... maybe I'll compile a new kernel, haven't done that
in a while. 
Thanks
Patrick

On 27 Aug 2001, Nathan England wrote:

> I grabbed Andrea's patch for the kernel on kernel.org and patched it
> before the stock kernel would see it..  
> Also, turn on code maturity levels.  I have no clue about anything red
> hat, except to stay far away, so you're on your own with that!
> 
> nathan
> 
> 
> 
> On 26 Aug 2001 18:49:31 -0700, Patrick Fleming wrote:
> > On 24 Aug 2001, Nathan England wrote:
> > 
> > > As long as your kernel supports it, build the kernel and then run
> > > tune2fs -j and that will create the journal..  If it's mounted it will
> > > still work, you'll just get a cool .journal file while it's doing it.
> > > Once it runs, took about 5 seconds, then change fstab to match ext3 and
> > > reboot.  That's all.
> > >
> > > Be sure and test tune2fs and make sure it has the -j option, if it
> > > doesn't you'll have to update your ext2utils.
> > 
> > And if the kernel doesn't have the ext3 option? Any idea what happens?
> > I have a feeling that mine doesn't, it wouldn't boot right after running
> > tune2fs -j /dev/hda5 and editing /etc/fstab, I had to re-edit fstab for it
> > to boot. So maybe the question is..did the stock kernel shipping with RH
> > 7.1 support ext3 out of the box?
> > Patrick
> > 
> > 
> > >
> > > nathan
> > >
> > >
> > > On 24 Aug 2001 08:13:18 -0700, foodog wrote:
> > > > Nathan, where'd you find docs on upgrading to ext3 (or how'd you do
> > > > it)?  I have Roswell running and would like to give it a try.  Thanks,
> > > > Steve
> > > >
> > > > Nathan England wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I have a 15gb partition with ext2 and after I read that article I tried
> > > > > to upgrade to ext3.  It is very painless, and seems to work flawlessly.
> > > > > I myself only use reiserfs, but I thought it worth an attempt.
> > > > >
> > > > > I have compiled 7 kernels and other stuff, while running a heavy
> > > > > database on the system, and just hit the powerswitch about 9 times, and
> > > > > it comes back each time.  The longest its's taken so far to read the
> > > > > journal and update is (to my best sense) about .5 a second..  So it's
> > > > > pretty good.  I'm not running a system like that, but it's a PIII 660E
> > > > > with 384 mb ram, so it's almost close!!! but slack 8 on it, and a web
> > > > > server, mysql, ldap, smb, and a few other databases... sap, a test
> > > > > version of oracle, db3.  And I've been beating the hell out of it since
> > > > > then.  It's working for me!!!
> > > > >
> > > > > Still like Reiser though, but that's cuz I'm used to it, tried and true.
> > > > > But in an environment where I couldn't wipe the drive and start over, or
> > > > > a back up would be too much, ext3 was as easy as it gets to upgrade to.
> > > > >
> > > > > nathan
> > > > >
> > > > > On 23 Aug 2001 21:37:08 -0700, Kevin Brown wrote:
> > > > > > I caught this link on Slashdot the other day and (not to start a flame war) was
> > > > > > wondering what people thought of ext3fs for large drives.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2001-08-22-004-20-NW-RH
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The reason I'm asking is that my company is looking to get a new server with 4
> > > > > > 73GB Ultra3 SCSI drives.  This will be a replacement/add-on server in the server
> > > > > > room running Linux as a database/web machine.  We have a Quad PII450 Xeon
> > > > > > running RH6.2 and it can take quite a long time to fsck the 60GB of current
> > > > > > space that it has when it boots up from something bad (Can't recall this ever
> > > > > > happening while I've been there).
> > > > > > ________________________________________________
> > > > > > See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > PLUG-discuss mailing list  -  PLUG-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> > > > > > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
> > > > >
> > > > > ________________________________________________
> > > > > See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
> > > > >
> > > > > PLUG-discuss mailing list  -  PLUG-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> > > > > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
> > > > ________________________________________________
> > > > See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
> > > >
> > > > PLUG-discuss mailing list  -  PLUG-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> > > > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________________________
> > > See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
> > >
> > > PLUG-discuss mailing list  -  PLUG-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> > > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
> > >
> > 
> > ________________________________________________
> > See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
> > 
> > PLUG-discuss mailing list  -  PLUG-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
> 
> 
> ________________________________________________
> See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
> 
> PLUG-discuss mailing list  -  PLUG-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
> 