Question regarding Linux kernels 2.2 and 2.4

[Thomas Mondoshawan Tate]

--gj572EiMnwbLXET9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Somebody asked me about that earlier, and I tried to reply, but his
mailserver bounced my message. *shrugs*

My mail client is Mutt with GPG extensions. The .dat file should be my GPG
signature.

One question regarding that, though: is it detremental to the reading of
this list for anyone? If it is, I can shut it off.

-- Mondoshawan

On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 05:56:10AM -0700, Tom Achtenberg wrote:
> Just curious why all of Thomas's emails have a small .dat file attached?
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: plug-discuss-admin@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> [mailto:plug-discuss-admin@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us]On Behalf Of Thomas
> Mondoshawan Tate
> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 8:20 PM
> To: plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> Subject: Re: Question regarding Linux kernels 2.2 and 2.4
>=20
>=20
> Hrmf... Guess I'm just too lacking in the versions of commercial distros =
--
> only copies of RH and Slack I have are versions 6.2 and 7.0 respectively.
> (not really interested in those distros -- an LFS system is all I need. =
=3Do)
>=20
> As for the non-existant 2.5 series: why does it trouble you?
>=20
> --
> Thomas "Mondoshawan" Tate
> phoenix@psy.ed.asu.edu
> http://tank.dyndns.org/presence
>=20
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 05:35:43PM -0700, Jim wrote:
> > All of the new distros come with 2.4.  I think it has gotten to the poi=
nt
> of
> > being nice and stable.  What troubles me is that we havent seen a 2.5
> series
> > yet.
> >
> > On Thursday 16 August 2001 16:58, you wrote:
> > > Anybody notice the abundance of people holding on and still patching =
the
> > > older 2.2 kernels? I've been rather curious about this for a while --
> > > didn't say much about it because I thought it was a fluke or somethin=
g.
> > > Isn't the existance of the 2.4 kernels saying that the experimental 2=
.3
> > > kernels have reached a stable version?
> >
> > ----------------------------------------
> > Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; charset=3D"us-ascii";
> > name=3D"Attachment: 1"
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> > Content-Description:
> > ----------------------------------------
> > ________________________________________________
> > See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't
> post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
> >
> > PLUG-discuss mailing list  -  PLUG-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>=20
> ________________________________________________
> See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't p=
ost to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
>=20
> PLUG-discuss mailing list  -  PLUG-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

--gj572EiMnwbLXET9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7fUyaYp5mUsPGjjwRAuoWAJ9/wIiX6jbOGciEbjyFbz8W4lcFMwCfWayQ
bwTKcYQ0cdSRH+V28BpSQEo=
=ZhDd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--gj572EiMnwbLXET9--