HP Open Mail
Gene Holmerud
geneous@bigfoot.com
Sun, 17 Sep 2000 20:50:15 -0700
Thanks for the tip. We'll look into it.
Gene
Date sent: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 20:36:00 -0700 (MST)
From: Robert Ambrose <rna@testpt.com>
To: plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
Subject: Re: Big bucks to M$, unless someone knows sendmail...
Send reply to: plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
>
> Take a look at openmail from HP (www.openmail.com).
>
> rna
>
> On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Gene Holmerud wrote:
>
> > Where I work (government) we're searching for a replacement for an
> > email system. The current system has custom hardware and software
> > and runs on (would you believe) a private X.25 WAN. It gets messages
> > to any or all 50-odd sites throughout the Western US in less than a
> > minute.
> >
> > Here's the new game plan/requirements:
> > 1. Solution needs to be "off the shelf" h/w and s/w.
> > 2. A private and robust IP WAN is in place, ready for use. The
> > Internet doesn't guarantee delivery times.
> > 3. A pair of servers that are data mirrors should be at one node.
> > 4. Another server mirroring data can be located at another node on
> > the WAN.
> > 5. Loading is very light (something like 10 to 20 1k messages per
> > client per hour).
> > 6. Reliability is very important, re: the robust WAN and multiple
> > servers.
> > 7. Failing from one of the paired servers to the other should be
> > nearly unnoticable to the client users. Failing to the second-site
> > server could require stopping the client and relogging in.
> > 8. Copies of messages sent from any client go to the intended
> > client(s) and to a repository (could be one of the servers).
> > 9. A convenient means of determining whither a given message has been
> > delivered. A return msg from each destination is not a good solution
> > as 50 such messages are just clutter, and one or two missed
> > deliveries would not be noticed, but should alert an administrator.
> > 10. Email client must have a forms capability. That is about 10 pre-
> > defined forms exist on servers and clients. User fills in the
> > blanks, and only the variable data is transmitted.
> > 11. Logins (user, client maintenance, server maint., & sys
> > management) must use encrypted passwords.
> > 12. Automatic printing of received messages at client sites.
> > 13. A folders capability for manual and/or automatic sorting and
> > retention of messages at the client.
> >
> > Yes, it's a tough spec. M$ Exchange 2000 comes somewhere near
> > fulfilling the requirements, but at something like $5k to $10k
> > licensing per server! If there's something close in the Linux
> > environment, I'd like to take a real hard look.
> >
> > Gene
> >
> > ________________________________________________
> > See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't post to the list quickl
y and you use Netscape to write mail.
> >
> > Plug-discuss mailing list - Plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
> >
>
>
> ________________________________________________
> See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't post to the list quickly
and you use Netscape to write mail.
>
> Plug-discuss mailing list - Plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss