mail server
D. Taylor
dtaylor@www.dssolutions.com
Wed, 23 Feb 2000 17:16:11 -0700 (MST)
If you're starting completely fresh, I would take
a gander at "qmail" as your Mail Transport Agent
(MTA). Also, if you're servicing 200 users, I wouldn't
chance it--I would definitely go with a 386-class
(or better) processor.
Dunno about providing POP service, but if you want
to consider IMAP, I would take a look at Cyrus.
My N$2,
D
On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, Joel Dudley wrote:
> Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 16:43:42 -0700
> From: Joel Dudley <joel@silverw.com>
> Reply-To: plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> To: plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> Subject: mail server
>
> Hello PLUG,
> My company is currently using an NT based mail server called Post.Office
> from software.com. To be truthful, it stinks and is a resource hog. They
> have agreed to let me install a Linux based mail server. I do, however,
> have a bit of newbieitis when it comes to mail servers on linux. Will
> sendmail be able to replace our server? Can it to POP and SMTP? We have
> about 200 accounts to move over, will sendmail be able to handle them all??
> If not, are there any other mail servers for Linux that can do all of the
> above? Thanks a thousand times in advance.
>
> - Joel Dudley
>
> Linux yellow-belt
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Plug-discuss mailing list - Plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>